A Rising ‘Wealth-Poverty Gap’: The Way Prosperity and Deprivation Now Sit Cheek by Jowl in Across England.
In Nunsthorpe, inhabitants live in homes only a few metres from their wealthier neighbours in the adjacent Scartho. One six-foot-tall barricade physically divides the two areas in Grimsby, Lincolnshire, blocking off paths and streets that previously connected them.
“This is the divide between rich and poor,” remarked Serenity Colley, aged 37. “It’s been like this since I’ve known. I doubt they’ll take it down because I don’t think they’ll want to mix with us.”
An Increasingly Common Pattern Across the Country
Analysis of official statistics reveals the extent of inequality often exists, at times over little more than a few metres of tarmac, a line of hedges or a wall. Years of austerity and lack of funding mean a majority of local authorities now contain a neighbourhood classified as one of the most deprived in the country.
This spread of poverty has coincided with a significant increase in the number of places where deprived and affluent residents end up living side by side. In 2019, only 65 of the poorest neighbourhoods bordered one of the wealthiest. That figure increased to 119 in the latest data.
A Barrier Which Divides More Than Space
In Grimsby, the divide is the most pronounced in the UK and starkly obvious. The wall transcends being just a symbolic division; it causes tangible problems for daily routines.
- School runs that should take a quarter of an hour become an sixty-minute journey.
- Access to key services like supermarkets, educational facilities and care homes is made more difficult.
- The area often sees vandalism and loitering, with instances of rubbish being dumped over the wall and related problems.
“You try to maintain a well-kept home and garden, and then you reside facing that,” said one local, motioning at the corroded barricade.
Local Bonds Against a Backdrop of Challenges
At Centre4, workers emphasise that support does not recognise addresses. “Where you live doesn’t necessarily indicate your personal struggles,” explained director Tracey Good.
Despite ranking in the lowest 10% for multiple deprivation indicators, Nunsthorpe retains a strong sense and feeling of togetherness among its inhabitants. By contrast, Scartho is classified among the least deprived 10% nationally.
A Similar Story: Stanhope in Ashford
This pattern is repeated nationally. The Stanhope area in Ashford, Kent, a 1960s housing development, is in the most disadvantaged tenth of neighbourhoods in the country. It is closely bordered by spacious houses built in the early 2000s that are in the wealthiest tenth for employment and quality of surroundings.
“They might have larger properties, but here there’s more community,” commented a long-term resident, 63. “It’s likely many people in the new builds never even talk to each other.”
The economic gap is clear: an average three-bedroom house sells for about £275,000 on the Stanhope estate, while on the other side equivalent properties go for about £410,000.
Locals describe a palpable sense of neglect. “This part of the community is neglected,” stated holistic health worker Susan. “Over here our amenities have slowly been taken away, and most of the community problems here are related to poverty.”
The increase in these ‘deprivation divides’ paints a portrait of an increasingly divided England, where prosperity and deprivation are often awkwardly in close proximity.