🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – not just the winner citywide, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst who grew up in the city, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as a kind of local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (correctly) that Mamdani would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in readership and the majority of electors favored the independent, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

It was necessary because they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the system frequently! I was actually somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate led the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of ballots that came in later and the advantage went from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world in which election day turned out somewhat badly for him, in which Cuomo was going to end up basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However Mamdani gained half a million votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Coalition Building

Where did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his core of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that progressives long aimed for: multiracial, youthful, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president last year backed the progressive now. However it’s not that he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought we might exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial opposition group, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s favored to surpass 50%. He has 50.4% but there’s still probably 200K ballots uncounted at that time. Thus I don’t think certain, but I think probable, and I hope he does because then no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, similar to an highly conservative neighborhood. That really surprised me. Cuomo held very white areas, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and plus gained all of these conservatives on the island with a high participation. I believe occurred significant tactical voting by the Republicans. This happened prior to Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think existed some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and residents all went for Cuomo. So there was a little resistance. But overall, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran won – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the election we reported on whether the candidate was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he did well. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential in those places. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned the independent. And also, there are newcomers from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, who were strongly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters on this one, but Mamdani did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from progressives come from a few areas in the boroughs. I believe that there will be additional examples – people will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that each urban center in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – since youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities exist.