🔗 Share this article

Through a per curiam ruling, the nation's top court cleared the way for Texas to implement a redrawn congressional boundary scheme that could add as many as five new Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three ruling, released on Thursday, grants a petition by the state to overturn a district court's block that had rejected the redistricting plan in November.

Court's Reasoning

The federal judge wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating significant confusion and upsetting the delicate equilibrium in elections, the supreme court said in detailing its action.

That lower court had previously found that Texas had likely sorted voters by their race – a practice known as illegal race-based districting – when it adopted the new maps. It had instructed the state to use the boundaries established after the most recent national count for the next year's election.

Stinging Opposition

Through a strongly worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's decision. She stated that it disregarded the work of the lower court, pointing out that its ruling was written by a judge nominated by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan stated in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, Today's ruling guarantees that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its increased partisan advantage, will dictate next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas voters, unjustly, will be sorted in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced consistently, is a infraction of the U.S. Constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Battle

The ruling is part of a nationwide fight over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in pushes to alter the U.S. House map to secure a slim Republican hold. Ordinarily, boundary revision happens after a ten-year survey. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year set off a wave among other states.

Conservative legislators in including North Carolina and Missouri have also approved redistricting plans that might create several additional Republican-leaning seats. Democratic lawmakers, for their part, have countered with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Political Responses

The Texas top lawyer welcomed the High Court's decision. In a release, he said the order upheld Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that guarantees representation favorable to his party. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he stated.

Conversely, Democratic officials criticized the ruling. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the chair of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another top Democratic leader stated the court had once again damaged its standing by approving a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he stated.